- ParentsToday
- Posts
- 👪Does Parental Wealth Boost SAT Scores? ✏️
👪Does Parental Wealth Boost SAT Scores? ✏️
Plus: The Gems Hiding in Plain Sight in the Treasury Market

Greetings ParentsToday Family, good morning! It's a splendid day as you are now accessing our elite segment, The Edge.
Here’s The Breakdown:
💎 𝟛 Newsletter to Give You The Edge
🚨 𝟚 Interesting Updates: Wealth boast SAT score ? & Gems in Treasury Market
💻 𝟙 Interesting quiz with Interesting prize
Let’s jump in!
Special Offer
Subscribe to The Edge for a one-month free access, no credit card details required. Claim your free month
💎 𝟛 Tools to Give You The EDGE
On The Fly: The growth-letter that delivers personal and professional development at a pace fit for the grind 🤜 🤛
Starytime: Bite-sized personalized historical bedtime stories - powered by A.I!
Parent Genius: Get the email that makes you smarter about parenting 0-6 year olds in just 5 minutes.

1. SAT Score Discrepancy Across Income Groups:
- Students from families in the top 20% of earners were seven times more likely to score at least 1300 on the SAT compared to those from the bottom 20%.
- Children of the top 1% richest families were 13 times more likely than the poorest students to score 1300 or higher.
- The top 0.1% of earners, averaging an income of $11 million, had children who scored even higher on average.
2. Test Participation:
- Less than 5% of middle-class students scored 1300 or higher, with only one in five from the poorest families even taking the test.
3. College Admission and Attendance:
- Wealthier children were found to be overrepresented at elite colleges due to better preparation, alongside other factors like admissions preferences.
4. Early Education Disparities:
- High-income children, on average, exhibited cognitive scores 60% higher than low-income children even before kindergarten.
- High-income children were also more likely to have attended preschool, which correlates with higher chances of taking the SAT and pursuing college education later on.
5. Extracurricular Investment:
- Wealthier families could afford various extracurricular and educational enrichment activities that contribute to better test preparation and overall academic performance.
6. Neighborhood and School Segregation:
- Income-based segregation has led to concentrated poverty or affluence in neighborhoods and schools, further widening the achievement gap.
7. Parental Investment:
- Rich parents spend more one-on-one time with their children on educational activities and are also able to spend more money on resources that contribute to their children's educational success.
8. School Funding:
- Disparities in school funding based on neighborhood wealth have led to poorer schools facing challenges in attracting and retaining quality teachers, among other disadvantages.
The analysis underscores a compelling link between parental wealth and a student’s SAT performance. This correlation manifests through various avenues, including access to resources, early education opportunities, and a conducive educational environment. Addressing the inherent inequities that stem from income disparities is crucial to leveling the playing field and ensuring that all students have a fair shot at achieving their academic aspirations..

In reflection to the lucrative bond yields of 1994, the current Treasury Market, while not offering the same treasures, holds promise for long-term bond investors. Back then, a mere investment in a 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yielded over 7% annually, with investment-grade bonds offering even higher returns. Fast forwarding to 2023, the scene has shifted with interest rates on the rise, but the high-yield gems of the past are scarce.
The silver lining amidst rising rates, which spell higher borrowing costs, is the potential relief for long-term bond investors from disappointing returns. The market now showcases short-term Treasury rates over 5%, 10-year Treasury bonds around 4.9%, and investment-grade corporate bonds above 6%, marking a shift from the ultra-low rates of previous years.
This upward trend in bond yields, mirroring the 1994 scenario, is tied to the Federal Reserve's tightening interest rate cycle amid inflation concerns. It’s a mixed bag - a potential boon for bond investors due to higher yields, and a burden for borrowers.
Key Takeaways for Investors:
1. Investment Strategy: A long-term horizon favoring a buy-and-hold strategy, especially through cheap index funds, is advocated, though it may not suit everyone, particularly those with shorter financial goals or lower risk tolerance.
2. Risk Reduction: Money-market funds emerge as a safer alternative with attractive yields, averaging 5.17%. The importance of considering fees is emphasized, as they can significantly impact returns in fixed-income investments.
3. Treasury Securities: The strategy of buying and holding Treasuries until maturity is highlighted, with a notable mention of two-year Treasuries hitting a yield of 5.2%, the highest since 2006. However, trading Treasuries carries a risk due to fluctuating interest rates.
4. Alternative Options: Bank certificates of deposit and high-yield savings accounts are mentioned as good choices, offering guarantees as secure as the U.S. government's credit.
5. Online Platforms: Treasury Direct is spotlighted as a fee-free platform for purchasing various Treasury securities, providing an alternative to broker-mediated purchases which may incur fees.
6. Future Uncertainties: The narrative underscores the Federal Reserve’s aim for a "soft landing" to control inflation without triggering a recession, akin to 1995, yet the uncertainty around interest rate movements remains a concern.
Special Offer
If you appreciate the insights above and are keen on discovering more hidden gems, you can now avail a one-month free access to our premium finance newsletter.
Interesting quiz with interesting prize
The fortunate winner will be featured in our newsletter and on our website.
P.S : We know you loved us here are our recommendations.